Register | Login | Set as Home Page | Bookmark | General Enquiries | Help | Friday, 10th of February 2012
HSS Logo
hsssearch.com
Search 
Magazine 
Register for our ENewsletter
Click to visit http://www.toyota-forklifts.co.uk/EN/resources/Pages/default.aspx

Coming up in H&SS February: Counterbalance Trucks; Heavy Duty Lifting & Moving; The Cold Store; Warehouse Flooring; Pallets & Pallet Handling; Bespoke Structures

Click to visit http://www.windsorkomatsu.co.uk

HSDGuide.com

An absorbing issue
February 1st 2009

Protecting racking uprights from potential impact is an operator's responsibility, but with many options available what type of system gives the best results? e-racking thinks it has the answer...

Health and safety in the workplace has never been as important as it is today, and the warehouse is one particular area where the risk of injury is high. Most warehouses are home to fast moving forklifts, pedestrians and heavy loads supported high on racking structures.

The HSE makes it clear that the operator has a responsibility to protect racking uprights against potential impacts from forklift trucks. The HSE booklet 'Warehousing and Storage: a guide to health and safety (HSG76)' states quite categorically that all racking uprights that could be hit with a forklift truck should be protected.

Available options However, with so many options available, what is the best way to provide this protection? Steel column guards bolted to the floor have been a traditional, if somewhat crude, method. Many rack manufacturers assert that steel is the best material to provide protection. However, it can be argued that steel protectors are in the best interest of the steel fabricators and not the end user. Rather than absorbing impact, in some cases steel transfers impact by permanently deforming at the weakest point until it damages either the bolts which attach it to the floor, or the concrete floor to which it is attached. Furthermore, to give adequate protection a reasonable gap needs to be left between the protector and the racking upright, encroaching into the aisle potentially causing other hazards.

So, what are the alternatives to steel for this application? There are various plastic, sponge or rubber protectors on the market. It is sensible to select a protector covered by test certificate from a recognised standards body, for example the Protect-it marketed by e-racking. Protect-it has been tested against the FEM front and side impact tests with uprights as thin as 1.6mm. The test results can be seen at www.eyecatcher.

com.au/protect-it/6.shtml Fit for building & mezzanine columns In addition to the rack protector, there is also a ProTect-it system designed to fit building and mezzanine columns that are at risk from impact damage. The design clips together to accommodate most column sizes. Again, the product has been well tested and a 2.7t forklift hitting a 200mm x 2000mm column at 6km/hr is reported to have caused no damage to the building column. The protector is also very small, adding only 150mm to the overall column size.

Furthermore, as the design uses minimum material, the costs are said to be low.

More articles from E-Racking Ltd (Insolvent FEB 2010):